The diamond industry has a long history tied to both luxury and controversy. In recent years, concerns about environmental damage and ethical practices have pushed more people to question where their diamonds come from.
One major debate now centers on the carbon footprint of lab-grown diamonds compared to traditionally mined ones. Both come with trade-offs, and the environmental impact depends on how and where each is made.
This article breaks down the carbon and environmental differences between lab-grown and mined diamonds—what contributes to their emissions, what often gets overlooked, and how consumers can make more informed choices.
The Basics: How Each Type of Diamond is Made
Mined Diamonds come from deep underground. They’re extracted through open-pit or underground mining. Both methods rely on heavy machinery, explosives, and lots of fuel. After extraction, rough diamonds go through sorting, cutting, and polishing.
Lab-Grown Diamonds are made in controlled environments using two main methods:
· HPHT (High Pressure High Temperature): mimics the natural conditions in the Earth’s mantle using high pressure and heat.
· CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition): uses carbon-rich gas and a diamond seed in a vacuum chamber. The carbon slowly builds up into a diamond.
Both result in real diamonds—chemically and physically identical to mined ones. The main difference lies in how much energy and environmental disruption is involved in creating them.
Energy Use and Emissions
This is where the biggest differences show up.
Traditional mining burns a lot of diesel. From running trucks and excavators to blasting rock, every step uses fuel. According to a 2019 report by Trucost (part of S&P Global), the average mined diamond emits around 160 kg of CO₂ per carat.
Lab-grown diamonds, on the other hand, use electricity. A lot of it. Especially in the HPHT process. If that electricity comes from fossil fuels, the carbon footprint can rival—or even exceed—mined diamonds. But when labs use renewable energy, emissions drop dramatically. Some companies powered by hydro or solar claim under 20 kg of CO₂ per carat.
So the real factor is the energy source. Lab diamonds made with clean power have a clear edge. But if made in a region that runs mostly on coal, that advantage disappears.
Land and Water Impact
Mining isn’t just about emissions. It leaves a mark on the land. Open-pit mines can stretch for miles and strip away forests, soil, and ecosystems. Water use is also high—both for processing ore and controlling dust. And in some cases, contaminated water can leak into local rivers or groundwater.
Lab-grown diamonds avoid most of this. Labs take up far less space and don’t involve deforestation or blasting. They still use water for cooling and cleaning, but the amount is generally smaller and easier to manage. No ecosystems are displaced. No giant craters left behind.
That said, lab production isn’t completely clean—it still relies on materials and infrastructure—but the direct environmental footprint is much lighter.
Environmental Impact per Carat
Metric | Mined Diamond | Lab-Grown Diamond (Renewable Energy) |
Carbon Emissions | 160 kg CO₂ | 20–30 kg CO₂ |
Water Use | 480 liters | 70 liters |
Mineral Waste | 2.63 tonnes | 0.0006 tonnes (600 grams) |
Energy Use (HPHT) | N/A | 28–36 kWh |
Energy Use (CVD) | N/A | 77–215 kWh |
Social Impact and Ethics
Environmental impact is only part of the story. There’s also the human side.
Traditional diamond mining has long been tied to labor issues, including dangerous conditions, low wages, and in some regions, links to conflict diamonds—stones used to fund armed violence. While big companies now follow stricter rules, problems still exist, especially in small-scale or unregulated mines.
Lab-grown diamonds sidestep most of this. They’re made in factories, often in countries with labor protections. There’s no digging, no forced labor, no funding of conflict. That makes them appealing for buyers who care about ethical sourcing.
Still, it’s not black and white. Mining can support jobs and local economies, especially in developing countries. Lab-grown diamonds don’t yet offer that kind of employment scale or community investment.
So while labs reduce human harm in the supply chain, there’s a broader economic trade-off to consider.
Certifications and Greenwashing
Both sides like to claim they’re “ethical” or “sustainable.” But without proof, those words don’t mean much.
Mined diamonds often come with Kimberley Process certification, which is supposed to block conflict diamonds. But it doesn’t cover environmental or labor standards. Some companies now offer additional audits or traceability, but it’s not consistent across the board.
Lab-grown diamonds are marketed as clean and eco-friendly—but not all are. Some labs use dirty energy. And some use vague terms like “eco-friendly” without backing it up.
That’s where third-party standards come in. For example:
- SCS-007 Certification evaluates sustainability across the whole diamond lifecycle—from energy and water use to carbon emissions.
- Carbon-neutral claims are becoming common, but you have to look at whether they’re reducing emissions or just buying offsets.
Bottom line: ignore the marketing. Look for independent certification if you actually care where your diamond comes from.
Consumer Perception and Market Trends
Public opinion is shifting. Fast.
Lab-grown diamonds were once seen as “fake” or low-end. Not anymore. Younger buyers, especially Millennials and Gen Z, are leaning toward lab-grown for ethical and environmental reasons—and because they cost less. The quality is the same, but without the baggage.
According to a 2023 report from Bain & Company, lab-grown diamonds now make up over 15% of the global diamond market, and that share keeps growing.
Mined diamonds still dominate the luxury market, especially for those who value tradition or see them as a long-term investment. But as awareness grows, lab-grown diamonds are becoming the default for people who want a cleaner option—or just don’t want to overpay.
In short, perception is changing, and it’s reshaping the industry.
Future Outlook
Both industries are under pressure to clean up—and fast.
Diamond mining companies are investing in greener practices, like electric mining equipment and more efficient water use. Some are testing carbon capture projects in mine tailings (the leftover rock). But change is slow, and large-scale mining is hard to decarbonize.
Lab-grown producers are focusing on cleaner energy. Some labs now run entirely on renewables or use carbon offsets to reduce their impact. As tech improves, lab processes are expected to become more energy-efficient and less resource-intensive.
Regulations and transparency will likely tighten. More buyers are asking where diamonds come from, how they’re made, and what impact they have. This demand could push both industries to improve—or get left behind.
In the long run, low-emission, traceable diamonds will probably become the norm. It’s just a matter of who adapts first.
Bottom Line: Which Has the Lower Carbon Footprint?
If we’re just looking at carbon emissions, lab-grown diamonds usually have the edge—especially when powered by clean energy.
- Mined diamonds: around 160 kg CO₂ per carat
- Lab-grown (renewables): 20–30 kg CO₂ per carat, sometimes less
- Lab-grown (fossil fuels): emissions can rise fast, even comparable to mined in some cases
So it depends on how the lab-grown diamond is made. Powering a CVD lab with coal doesn’t make it green. But when made using renewables, lab-grown diamonds clearly generate fewer emissions, with far less impact on land and water.
That said, no diamond is truly “zero-impact.” But if reducing your carbon footprint matters, a certified lab-grown diamond made with clean energy is currently the best option.
Conclusion
The diamond you choose has more than just financial value—it comes with an environmental cost.
Mined diamonds require massive land use, fossil fuels, and water. Lab-grown diamonds aren’t perfect, but they skip the blasting and deforestation, and when powered by renewables, they leave a much smaller carbon footprint.
If you care about sustainability, the better option is clear: go with a lab-grown diamond from a producer that uses clean energy and third-party certification.
Less impact. Fewer unknowns. Same sparkle.
.